Illinois Prison Talk
News: wc75-1  ILLINOIS PRISON LOCKDOWN STATUS:
MENARD ON LOCKDOWN. LIMITED VISITS ALLOWED. 
HILL OFF LOCKDOWN.
   

 
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. May 22, 2012, 11:43:43 PM


Login with username, password and session length


Pages: 1   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Talking to Inmates Costly for Families, Attorneys  (Read 740 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Forevermah
Administrator
Hero Member
******

Karma: 338
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Location: Illinois
Posts: 11820



WWW
« on: September 26, 2011, 08:20:07 AM »

Talking to inmates costly for families, attorneys

HEATHER HOLLINGSWORTH, Associated Press
Updated 12:43 p.m., Sunday, September 25, 2011
   


KANSAS CITY, Mo. (AP) — Kimberly Scardina-Gomez has pawned jewelry and even skipped paying the electric bill so she can afford for her 16-year-old son to talk on the phone with his father, who is serving a robbery sentence at a state prison in Illinois.

What really irks her is that phone companies are giving a chunk of the revenue they make from handling calls for families like hers — 42 percent is typical, according to an analysis finished this year— back to jail and prison operators in exchange for the business.

Prison Legal News, a West Brattleboro, Vt.-based publication that advocates for the rights of inmates, found that among state prison systems, commissions cost prisoners' families, friends and attorneys more than $152 million in 2008, the year studied. A report released this month by the Government Accountability Office found that of the $74 million in revenue generated in 2010 by the Bureau of Prisons' inmate telephone system, about $34 million was profit.

Under pressure, states such as Kansas and Florida have reduced commissions while others such as Nebraska and New York have stopped accepting commissions. In California, which ended commissions earlier this year, phone rates declined by 61 percent, Prison Legal News found. Advocacy groups want more prison and jail operators to follow suit or persuade the Federal Communications Commission to establish caps on inmate phone rates.

"It's not fair," said Scardina-Gomez, a 35-year-old laid off paralegal and second-year law student from Chicago. "You see all kinds of studies talking about how to reduce recidivism, how to stop repeat offenders. Things of that nature all start with family structure. They all start with positive reinforcement, yet they don't try to reinforce that at all."

Because of the commissions, receiving calls from inmates cost as much as $15 to $25 for a 15-minute conversation — often five times as high as ordinary collect call rates.

"Whenever you've got money in the mix, it's hard to get away from it," said Paul Wright, editor of Prison Legal News. "It's like telling a crack addict to lay off the dope. Even if they know they should, it's hard to get them to do it."

The GAO, which studied phone rates as part of a larger report on contraband cell phones being snuck into federal prisons, said lowering rates could increase communication between inmates and their families, helping the inmates reintegrate when they got out of prison. But it said there would be less money available for things like paying wages for inmate labor and offering education and recreational activities.

Bureau of Prison officials told the GAO that the programs were important because "inmate idleness increases the risk of violence, escapes and other disruptions" but noted that Congress would be unlikely to chip in the money. Even critics of the commissions acknowledge it's tough to generate sympathy for inmates, and Wright said their families are "right up there with single welfare moms and illegal immigrants as far as bashable, disenfranchised constituencies that no one gets too concerned about."

And the expense isn't just borne by the families of the 2.3 million people incarcerated in U.S. jails and prisons but often by the attorneys who represent them — a practice that some groups allege discourages attorneys from talking to their clients.

The phone companies defend the rates in briefs filed with the FCC, saying their phone systems require costly security devices to keep inmates from harassing potential witnesses or orchestrating crimes from behind bars.

Plus, states and counties — many of them facing deficits because of the recession — have become dependent on the money they earn from the commissions.

"It offsets other costs and allows certain programs for inmates to continue — some training programs, some rehab programs," said Fred Wilson, director of operations for the National Sheriff's Association. "However, we have taken a stand and said the rates need to be reasonable."

Stephanie Joyce, an attorney for Dallas-based inmate communication provider Securus Technologies Inc., which offers phone service for about 2,300 correctional facilities in 44 states, said the issue of who pays for jails and prisons is one for policymakers to decide and that Securus merely collects the commissions when contracts require it to do so.

"If my client doesn't want to go bankrupt and pay out more than it takes in, then the site commissions must be recovered," Joyce said. "It wasn't Securus' decision to invent site commissions."

Fifty-five-year-old Samella Green has benefited from a 40-percent reduction in phone rates in Kansas. But the Wichita woman and her husband, who live on federal disability payments, still spend about $200 a month to talk to four incarcerated relatives.

"It's an enormous weight for people to carry because so many people have family in there," she said.

http://www.chron.com/news/article/Talking-to-inmates-costly-for-families-attorneys-2188116.php
Logged

Do not value the "things" you have in your life - value "who" you have in your life....



“Instead of thinking about what you're missing, try thinking about what you have that everyone else is missing.”
Favored23
Support Staff
Hero Member
*****

Karma: 70
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2479


Thank you Lord!


« Reply #1 on: September 26, 2011, 10:52:03 AM »

Funny, I know Kimberly! 
Logged

Psalm 146:7 (NIV)

 7 He upholds the cause of the oppressed
       and gives food to the hungry.
       The LORD sets prisoners free!!
Marks_guy
Support Staff
Hero Member
*****

Karma: 29
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 2304



« Reply #2 on: September 26, 2011, 12:53:41 PM »

I don't think any of us would ever be happy to pay Consolidated's high costs, but it would be better if we knew exactly what the extra commission money was being spent on. If IDOC said that part of the cost goes to fund certain programs, the hardship would be easier to swallow.

Logged
ltruitt
Jr. member
**

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 5


« Reply #3 on: September 28, 2011, 08:40:45 AM »

The costs are ridiculous. My husbands been gone 9 years and I can not even imagine the amount of money spent. Maybe if they were charging reasonable prices the cell phone contraband issue would go down. Us families out here in the world are struggling enough with this economy, struggling enough with our LO being incarcerated, and then they punish us more with the absorbent call prices, turning an already multi million dollar human warehousing industry even more profitable with our call money being kicked back to IDOC. Yet they dont  have the money to pay the food bills. Blows my mind. 

Get ready cause its only gonna get worse! I really empathize with all of us out here that have LO on a long stretch... I seen this article is all over the internet, hopefully it reaches the hands of people who can make a difference...
Logged
Pages: 1   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines

© 2006-2012 Illinois Prison Talk, All Rights Reserved
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM