PRISON FOOD - DISPARITY IN QUALITY/QUANTITY??
One of the issues that the HJR80 committee should look into as they examine issues related to long-term prisoners is the disparity in the quality and quantity of food served at the various prisons. I have now heard from three different inmates transferred out of Menard to 3 different medium security prisons (Hill, IRCC, and Lawrence) who are delighted by the better food offered at their respective prisons. One inmate went so far as to say the food at Lawrence is “100 times better” than the food at Menard. They are served bigger portions and better tasting food.
So I wonder, is this a function of the various security levels? Does food increase in quantity and quality as security level decreases? If it’s true that the food at the maximum security joints is horrible, so horrible that many inmates choose to eat the snack food from commissary rather than the chow hall food, then what must it be like at Tamms?
Should the food be worse for higher security inmates? Is this part of their punishment?
Basic necessities such as food, clothing, and medical care should be equal at all the prisons. The punishment should be in the sentence they receive, the higher number of years they must serve. In fact, I believe that a prisoner with a long-term sentence should start out at a maximum security joint, but should be allowed through good behavior and achievement to work his way up to lower security level prisons. Most guards will tell you that the older inmates who have been incarcerated for 20 or more years are the least troublesome of the population. Why, then, should they have to rot away in maximum security until they die? Some are allowed to move to high mediums once they turn 50. But it’s not a given. Those not serving LWOP can move to lower level prisons once they are within so many years of release. Transfers to lower security prisons should be earned through good behavior and not given only to those with diminishing sentences.
A sentence of Life Without Parole is punishment enough. A life behind bars. A life without freedom, without family, without any semblance of a normal existence. Society needs to understand that the punishment is being locked away from family and society. Nothing else needs to be inflicted upon them. If prisons allowed all inmates to work, if they provided classes for them take, peer group counseling, book clubs, art therapy, charitable outlets – the end result would not be that the inmates would feel pampered! Prison would not become desirable. Again, the punishment of prison comes from the lack of freedom and the institutionalization. I doubt very much if Martha Stewart would like to go back to Alderson even though her stay there was not harsh. It was still prison.
Critics would decry that prisons have become too much like summer camp. I disagree. Allowing structured activities and providing work opportunities would go a long way towards meeting the supposed goal of corrections to rehabilitate inmates, even those serving life sentences. And certainly, basic necessities such as food should be equal.
How are meals planned for the inmates? Is each prison responsible for meal planning? Or is it done in a central location? Does the monetary allotment per inmate change according to location? Does anyone in Springfield oversee and manage the food being distributed to the prisons and fed to the inmates?
On IPT we have an excellent representation of family members with inmates at most of the prisons. Let’s keep track of the meals that are served to our inmates for the next few weeks and do a comparison. I’ll also contact the IDOC and see if menus are available for the various prisons. Then we can see if they match up to what is actually being served.Jim has told me, for instance, that the few times that salads are served, they can easily be eaten in two bites. Fresh fruit consists of the occasional apple and banana. No beef is served; it’s all soy product. Breakfast is predictable, and served very early in the morning so that by the time the inmate gets up, what was supposed to be served hot is cold, and what was supposed to be served cold is warm. Cereal used to be served in a little box, but now inmates get a handful of cereal in the Styrofoam tray and are expected to pour milk from their little pouches into the tray and eat it. And of course, the servings are not equal. One tray may have a decent serving while a cellie’s tray may have half as much. When they serve oatmeal or cream of wheat, they also include a piece of toast – served smashed into the cereal. Pancakes and sausages are served cold.
I understand that IRCC has pretty good breakfasts by comparison. The only problem is, the inmates have to get up at the crack of dawn to go to chow. I’ve heard some places start serving breakfast as early as 3:30 a.m.! I’d be buying Pop Tarts at the commissary if that were the case.
So, out of curiosity, let’s keep track for awhile and do a comparison of what is being served. I’m interested in what the meals consist of as well as the portion sizes and the quality of the food being served.
*For a complete index of previous IPT editorials click here: http://xsorbit30.com/users5/illinoisprisontalk/index.php?board=92.0